Free Case Review (248) 540-9270
You trusted that your new vehicle would work. Then something went wrong. Maybe the engine stalls without warning, or a safety system fails at the worst possible moment. Discovering a serious defect is stressful enough on its own. What makes it worse is when the manufacturer turns around and points the finger at you, claiming the problem is your fault.
This happens more often than most drivers realize. Manufacturers have legal teams trained to protect the company’s interests, and shifting blame onto the consumer is a common defense tactic. Knowing how to respond can be the difference between a successful lemon law claim and a denied one. At The Liblang Law Firm P.C., we help clients build strong, evidence-backed claims when manufacturers push back.
When a vehicle defect surfaces under warranty, the manufacturer is responsible for repairing or replacing it. To avoid that obligation, manufacturers frequently argue that the owner caused the problem through misuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications. These claims include accusations such as:
These arguments can sound convincing, but they are not automatically true. The burden of proof matters here. The manufacturer must show that your actions, not a product flaw, caused the defect. That is a high bar to clear when documented repair history tells a different story.
Strong evidence shifts the conversation away from fault and toward facts. When a manufacturer challenges your claim, the following types of documentation work in your favor:
The more organized and thorough your paper trail, the harder it becomes for a manufacturer to sustain a blame-shifting argument.
Every time you brought your vehicle in for the same recurring problem, you created a record. That repair history demonstrates a pattern, which is exactly what lemon law requires. Under Michigan’s lemon law, a vehicle may qualify for repurchase if the manufacturer fails to repair a defect that significantly impairs the use, safety, or value of the vehicle after a reasonable number of attempts.
Repair history also undermines claims of misuse. If the dealership’s own technicians inspected the vehicle multiple times without flagging owner negligence, the manufacturer’s later accusations become far less credible.
A denial is not a final answer. Manufacturers routinely challenge or reject claims hoping consumers will give up. If your lemon law claim has been denied or disputed, you still have options:
Manufacturers have resources and legal teams ready to defend every claim. You deserve the same level of representation on your side. The Liblang Law Firm P.C. has protected Michigan consumers since 1982 and has a 99% success rate in lemon law cases. Contact us for a free, no-obligation case review.

